The Academic Perspective Procedia publishes Academic Platform symposiums papers as three volumes in a year. DOI number is given to all of our papers.
Publisher : Academic Perspective
Journal DOI : 10.33793/acperpro
Journal eISSN : 2667-5862
Year :2018, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages: 702-708
09.11.2018
Effects of Tension Reinforcement Ratio on Ductility of Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures
Failure mode of reinforced concrete (RC) structures are classified according to tension reinforcement ratio of beam elements. To determine effect of tension reinforcement ratio on performance of RC structure, two planar RC structure were selected. One of them is 5 stories other of them is 7 stories. Two different concrete class, C20 and C25, were considered for analysis. Three tension reinforcement combinations were considered, three different tension reinforcement ratios were used. First case is the ratio of the tension reinforcement is lower than that of the compression reinforcement, second case is the ratio of the tension reinforcement is equal to the ratio of the compression reinforcement and third case is the ratio of the tensile reinforcement is higher than the compression reinforcement.
[1] Theriault, M., and Benmokrane, B., Effects of FRP reinforcement ratio and concrete strengthon flexural behavior of concrete beams. Journal of composites for construction, 1998, 2.1: 7-16.
[2] Fantilli, A. P., Ferretti, D., Iori, I., and Vallini, P., Behaviour of R/C elements in bending andtension: the problem of minimum reinforcement ratio. In: European Structural IntegritySociety. Elsevier, 1999. p. 99-125.
[3] Ashour, S. A. Effect of compressive strength and tensile reinforcement ratio on flexuralbehavior of high-strength concrete beams. Engineering structures, 2000, 22.5: 413-423.
[4] Lee, T., Pan, A. D.. Estimating the relationship between tension reinforcement and ductility ofreinforced concrete beam sections. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25.8: 1057-1067.
[5] Rodrigues, H. (2012). Biaxial seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns. PhD Thesis,Universidade de Aveiro.
[6] Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Turkish Earthquake Code 2007, Ankara,Turkey.
[7] SeismoStruct v7- A computer program developed for the accurate analytical assessment ofstructures, subjected to earthquake strong motion. Available online: www.seismosoft.com
[September 8, 2014].
[8] Kwon, O.S. and Kim, E. Case study: Analytical investigation on the failure of a two-story RCbuilding damaged during the 2007 Pisco-Chincha earthquake. Engineering Structures, 2010,32, 1876-1887.
[9] Duan, H. and Hueste, M.B.D. Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete frame building inChina. Engineering Structures, 2012, 41, 77–89.
[10] Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., Park, R., Theoretical stress-strain model for confinedconcrete, Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 1988, pp. 1804–1826.
[11] TEC 2007, Turkish Earthquake Resistant Design Code, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement,Ankara, 2007
Cite
@article{acperproISITES2018ID127, author={Onat, Onur and Yön, Burak}, title={Effects of Tension Reinforcement Ratio on Ductility of Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures}, journal={Academic Perspective Procedia}, eissn={2667-5862}, volume={1}, year=2018, pages={702-708}}
Onat, O. , Yön, B.. (2018). Effects of Tension Reinforcement Ratio on Ductility of Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures. Academic Perspective Procedia, 1 (1), 702-708. DOI: 10.33793/acperpro.01.01.127
%0 Academic Perspective Procedia (ACPERPRO) Effects of Tension Reinforcement Ratio on Ductility of Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures% A Onur Onat , Burak Yön% T Effects of Tension Reinforcement Ratio on Ductility of Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures% D 11/9/2018% J Academic Perspective Procedia (ACPERPRO)% P 702-708% V 1% N 1% R doi: 10.33793/acperpro.01.01.127% U 10.33793/acperpro.01.01.127